Is it fair to punish someone for a crime that they Essay Example For Students

Is it reasonable for rebuff somebody for a wrongdoing that they Essay might not have submitted? Should an Olympic competitor be rebuffed for taking a medication that doesn't influence his exhibition, or give him an inconvenience over his competitors?As a large number of you may have heard, Ross Rebagliati is the Canadian snowboarder that won the primary ever Olympic Gold Medal for snowboarding. After he won, The International Olympic Committee reported his exclusion from the Olympics, and that he was to be deprived of his decoration, since they discovered hints of maryjane in his pee test. Mrs. Bongard and individual colleagues, Under the conditions, Ross Rebagliati ought not have lost his award. To begin, weed isn't a presentation improving medication. Numerous medications can upgrade the exhibition of a competitor. For instance, Steroids increment ones muscle level, making them more grounded, quicker and so on. These medications are said to give the competitor an unjustifiable preferred position over the others. Any decision dependent on the utilization of execution improving medications is supported, yet since cannabis has almost no impact on a competitors execution, and it would not give him a bit of leeway over different competitors, a decision dependent on the utilization of pot isnt important. Moreover, numerous specialists have expressed that pot gives the competitor a burden over others since it could make that competitor tired, or frail. Rebagliatis pee test indicated follow measures of weed. Specialists state that it is entirely conceivable that one could breathe in this modest quantity, carefully from being in a similar room as others who were smoking it. Ross Reb agliati told the press that he had not smoked weed since last April, 9 months before the Olympics, and the last opportunity he interact with the medication, was at a gathering about seven days before the Olympics, where others were smoking cannabis. This implies the Olympic Committee made its decision without knowing whether Rebagliati ever smoked cannabis. The International Olympic Committee doesn't have a specific determinations for the measure of cannabis that one is permitted to have in his pee. As indicated by their principles, weed is entirely lawful. The International Ski Federation, nonetheless, records an edge of convergence of 15 nanograms for each milliliter. As I would see it, the IOC ought not make decisions dependent on the guidelines of the International Ski Federation, since clearly they don't have the foggiest idea how to accurately actualize those standards. One may feel that since smoking maryjane is illicit, Ross Rebagliati doesnt have the right to win a decoration at any rate. In spite of the fact that this is a sensible perspective, it is inconceivable for each and every law, of every single nation that takes an interest in the Olympics to be authorized by the International Olympic Committee. Maybe every nation ought to authorize its laws for its own national titles, however not for the Olympics. After the IOC reported Rebagliatis preclusion, The Canadian group documented an intrigue. The intrigue board upset the International Olympic Committees choice on the grounds that the principles in regards to the utilization of cannabis are fluffy, and on the grounds that they understood that the IOCs choice was unfit. Despite the fact that Ross Rebagliatis decoration was come back to him, this entire episode will in any case influence him significantly for a mind-blowing remainder. For instance, a considerable lot of his backers will reconsider about whether or not to rehire him. Likewise, his picture in the eye of the open will be enormously influenced. I figure the IOC ought to take in an extraordinary exercise from this incident:They ought to be considerably more cautious before they until the end of time make an allegation of this nature.